I agree with Jason, the toning is very unusual for a 56 but the indicators all point to NT. If that coin is AT, it has achieved the pinnacle of...
NT on the Franklin
How did that not star, c'mon NGC
If the nickel isn't PL, then yes, it deserves a star.
That coin is beautiful and deserves a star. I wish that people would look past toning breaks that don't negatively affect the eye appeal of the...
Definitely a secondary toning but I don't know if I can call it artificial. I going with MA on this one.
MS65+
AT
Those are pretty but the toning on both looks very questionable. Still, how can you go wrong for $28.
Totally deserves a star, I love that coin.
Agreed, the rules for the star designation preclude any coin with toning approaching terminal. The entire obverse of that coin is terminally...
I'm not sure if it is AT but it is ugly as sin. I say NT/MA.
He is a member on the NGC forum also, but nobody over there could be considered "active" at this point.
It’s impossible to judge the luster or even see luster breaks in those photos. I will say MS64.
I’m saying no on both Morgans. They are so common with fantastic bright rainbow toning that these two are stretch. The first doesn’t cover...
Wait, who took that photo? Did you get a new camera? Awesome coin btw!
Ok, here is a rainbow toned full step premium gem Jefferson Nickel for consideration. [img]
I saw them as well and think they would definitely preclude a 6FS designation from NGC, but I think the coin is solid for NGC 5FS or PCGS FS...
Thats one of the nicest obverse toned Rosies I have ever seen, beautiful!
Separate names with a comma.
