WOW! It's fantastic, the original pictures were just bizarre.
Slight rub, AU-58 details. That's a pretty good example though, not many bubbles. Here's one of mine: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
No way! The edge brown toning is near terminal, you'd damage the coin with a dip.
Terminal sulfide layer, you can only make it worse IMO.
1) Eye appeal 2) Luster 3) Well struck
Hummm....I'm getting old. I thought I got this elsewhere. LOL
WOW! Surprisingly similar!
And this 1932: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Yes they are - I've seen 2 original WR albums and most of the coins were toned. Both times the dealer didn't want to break the sets...but I spent...
DDD, Die Deterioration Doubling. VERY cool LDS coin!
If you use ebay, you can do no wrong as a seller as far as shipping. They generate the label - never ship to any other "I have this problem..."...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
It's called a counter-stamped coin, not done by the mint. It's not something most people collect, it's just a novelty item. That said, some people...
The MM is not missing, it's a Philly issue coin and those don't have a MM. The light 4 is due to a grease fill die. Other than that, it's a...
The easiest way to tell is by the distance from the rim. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
That's pretty nice, mine looks dull in the pictures too but the luster is blazing. I was happy to find one with fully formed steps and no...
Not with my luck, probably come back at 66RD. LOLOLOL The TPG's pi$$ me off more than anything, they suck at grading Lincolns IMO. In the gem+...
@cladking should enjoy those!
Here's my 73-S, found after MANY years of searching. I have not sent it in but the 67's I see have nothing on this coin IMO.
The 66's are pretty poor IMO, I've probably tossed a few 66's into the junk pile while searching - check out the ha.com images. The same blemishes...
Separate names with a comma.
