It is weakly struck but look at the step detail. It might not be full steps but it’s awfully close. One of the many reasons why I don’t like...
AU58
$200
Based on the last photo, it looks MS65 BN. Were you using diffused lighting in the initial Photos? The luster looks totally washed out
MS62 RB
+1
My guess is $1350
When I was collecting toned geM SLQ’s I found that toning rarely drove a significant premium. The 1917 T1 in MS66FH is worth over $1K without...
The strike is a little mushy and the luster looks about average, I say MS63
Do you realize that I’m the author of the thread you just linked? And the key word in their standard is “major disturbance” which means they...
Smh
That’s awful AT
The problem is that PCGS allows shallow marks across the steps as long as (in their opinion) it doesn’t fully interrupt the steps. Also, it is...
You should enter that coin in the toning premium thread.
Breaking out the good stuff, that coin has to be premium gem. Bravo!
That coin is incredible, is it graded?
I think it’s silly to pay those ridiculous prices for strike designations. For date/mm where full steps is common, I think the designation...
I’ve never seen a full step 54-S, my registry coin has almost 2 steps. [IMG]
We actually have a thread for that, feel free to check it out and post the coin. The Slabbed (NGC/PCGS) AT-QT (Artificial/Questionable Toning) Thread
The problem is that people try to sell these sets for ridiculous prices. This is the first set I have ever found where almost all of the coins...
Separate names with a comma.
