This looks like a normal cent Jimm. For this date (obverse design), the relief/fields look deeper than used starting in 1969. Dates for this...
Yes...a fun find!!
In the same condition, the non-VDB would be about $2-3 or the VDB is about 3X more. Figure that through an XF range, that'll hold true. After...
I didn't catch that I hadn't copied the photograde link as thought. Alurid got the link right though.
Perhaps a VG08 - http://www.coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1960&die_id=1960d1mm109&die_state=lds
...or pickled and sent back out into the wild.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
See that Collecting Nut...I started a trend!!
LOL...my apologies. I was stuck waiting in the truck for my son to return from a meet so I was trying to kill time on the phone. The trouble I...
Hello Leo - when taking photos and posting them for comment, you'll need to take 'optimal' photos. When taking photos of a specimen, you'll want...
Die deterioration. Note the outer devices are most affected. The material flow is also more noticeable as you get to the rim.
Oh...diffused lighting.
I expected to see damage. Perhaps better photos will confirm the anomaly. When taking photos, use something heavy to hold the phone against to...
That’s die deterioration. You’ll see ghost images about the devices as the die ages. Very common on Zincolns.
I understand. Typing on my phone at the moment; autocorrect is a part time friend.
That’s the reverse design. Post the obverse. I’m interested to see if there is damage there too.
Probably a damaged coin as noted by Fred. Post the obverse.
I agree with our fellow enthusiasts. Deep because of LDS but exacerbated and damaged (maybe by the washer). It’s a spender.
I agree with kanga and Fred. This seemed to have happened a lot in 1948. Set it aside. You’ll come across more of these. In fact, CRH...
Perhaps some type of media blasting (eg. fine sand).
Separate names with a comma.
