I'm still bouncing back and forth on those with one of my examples. Here's my spreadsheet notes for a non 57-A. (which I also have) 1883 O MS63...
Crap, I missed it!:p:p
I might have paid that if it had an extra E on the reverse.
A Rattler with a gold bean, nice one DV! :)
Agree with 64 best case scenario.
Both the OP and the high jacker need to stick around and learn how to grade Morgans. Both are serious problem coins. Welcome to CT.
Yep, VAM4. The only other one that comes close is VAM16 and that is only under traffic camera photos, which these are clearly not. Nice pick and...
Being a VAMmer these little guys fall right in line. ;)
I like your 1867 Paddy, here's mine. [ATTACH]
I'm at 66RB but 66RD would not shock me especially if it's an older holder.
Nice pick and yes, I'm guilty.
I agree with 62/63. As is, it's not worth submitting unless you had an open spot to fill in a bulk submission. Seeing the coins you post I'm sure...
MS64 possibly 65. The reverse looks PL but the obverse appears to fall short.
Awesome cherry pick. I see it as an easy 62.
My first impression was MS64*
Getting very warm, heck hot. ;)
It's very dull and lifeless, likely cleaned and re-toned. If it were a desirable VAM it would still be worth buying but,,,it looks like a VAM-1...
DDG - drop dead gorgeous!
I would say neither as well based on the corrosion and I think the grade is a bit optimistic on the 1847. Keep looking, there are many AU Large...
It does not look like original surfaces to me but does appear to be an excellent strike that would likely warrant an FH designation.
Separate names with a comma.
