From a collector perspective, the TPG view that mechanical errors are “no big deal” is a huge problem. IIRC correctly, one of the original goals...
I am a toning enthusiast but I find that toning extremely unattractive. So if my choice is either that toning, or blast white, I would take blast...
MS64, have no idea of VAM
That’s gorgeous!
I’m outta town till Monday, I gotta pass
Who was the seller? It’s not Greattoning. Kinda looks like John-Strategies photos but he doesn’t usually have coins with this high price tag....
Very nice, I love the obverse on that 60-P, colorful and flashy!
That’s a little cynical.
For the record, my higher number is the enhanced photos. I didn’t understand that the enhanced photos sold second
I almost hope you are right. If it comes back MS66+, my decision is real easy, I keep my rainbow toned MS66 and sell this one. But if it comes...
$1200 $1050
I’ve never seen an impaired proof with that many marks and the steps should be even bolder on a proof. Early 60’s Nickels are rare in full steps...
The coin shown above, NGC MS66 is my current registry coin.
The sad part is that even if the coin in question comes back MS67, it still might not earn its way into my registry set.
Your coin has a lot of remaining detail and luster, but it is still only an AU Jefferson Nickel. And although there is excellent step detail,...
Coin #1 has been replaced by a cleaner and more attractive NGC MS66 [IMG]
Both of those Nickels show evidence of circulation wear. The one on the right appears to have semi-proof-like surfaces which may account for the...
I agree, I think they should pay for their own mistakes, but they won’t.
Yeah, I misunderstood the OP, I thought he was sending it back to NGC, not back to who he bought it from.
When I viewed the photo, my reaction was “what the heck is that in the left obverse field?” I knew the mark was there but it almost appeared like...
Separate names with a comma.
