I think it'd be near impossible to get a PL grade on a 55-S. It would have to have mirror surfaces.
I also found this 2000 with "matte like" surfaces, awesome looking 2000 in hand: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
The 83D is PMD and plating bubbles, damaged coin, worth 1 cent. The 2000 looks like any other average, circulated coin. Nothing unusual, worth 1...
1983 and up ALL weigh 2.5g.
VF-20, technical VF due to separation between the cheek and jaw.
The 1960-D small and large dates were minted in about equal numbers, the small date has no price premium.
Whoa, certainly deceiving seller photos, I'm down to 63/64 RD.
Nope, future work!
[ATTACH]
Where's the reverse? You're only showing us half the coin.
65RB, looks like a very nice example!
A Red Book is a worthwhile investment.
At a local coin show I was going through a giant "bargain bin" and found this in a 2x2 for $1. Someone didn't look at it very close, must have...
1999 Broad struck, partial brockage, incuse lettering error. My fav local B&M owner took in a ziplock bag with errors collected by a bank teller...
This is what the small date looks like, it's a subtle difference that's easiest to see by the 9 and the 0. [ATTACH]
If it's not a small date, which it probably isn't, it's not worth anything unless it's mint state like this one: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
The difference between the large and the small date is obvious, top large, bottom small: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
The 1968S is the lowest mintage Memorial cent. However, they are only worth saving if in mint state. They were widely hoarded, so they are easy to...
1 cent, all of the 1988D's are WAM. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Post Mint Damage
Separate names with a comma.
