Then he's wrong. Copper + Zinc + Brass; Copper + Tin = Bronze. In the pricing guides, while both varieties are scarce, the earlier Bronze piece...
I wouldn't even mind sending coins to ICG or SEGS if I just wanted a holder. Some people collect and can grade coins, while others care about the...
Unless you personally took those photos and know it was the same coin, I would wager a substantial amount of cash that they are picks of two...
88% Copper and 12% Zinc is Brass. It is actually the alloy used in Canada for the 1942 and 1943 nickels and is known as Tombac. With alloys,...
That's why I use ANACS for a lot of coins. Can get a descent holder for ~$10.
A DEATH of good deals, or a DEARTH?
I wouldn't buy the first one, but I would the second. The pictures make it look like two different coins. The second at least shows some luster.
Do what I've done a few times - buy a dozen. Makes them lose a bit more.
That item number shows a 2018 "proof" for $1.99 from China. If you think you are going to steal a proof silver eagle for $2, you need to buy a vowel.
The design isn't even close - whether you compare it to a 1986 or 2018. Did they post a picture of a real one in the auction?
64
Ejection doubling. You can see it on the date too.
Just look for bullion, Morgan dollars, rare Seated Lib dollars, etc. You'll see them. Or just looks at the posts on here.
You can buy privy-marked proofs for less... even on eBay!
Being mostly a buyer on eBay, I am pleased. Now if they would just get rid of the counterfeits.
In 1967 they made these in more than one mint, just without the mint mark. From www.rooseveltdimes.net: "For the years 1965 to 1967, coins...
'S' is for San Francisco. What do you mean that they don't know their mint marks?!?
Probably Cirds.
Good for you, although I think the MS63 one listed by another poster was a nicer coin.
I'd say AU58, but not very attractive.
Separate names with a comma.
