I am not seeing anything from those angles. I checked the cherry pickers guide, but nothing was listed.
Nice addition. Showing some nice luster on that coin.
I would net it at VF because of the corrosion and the cleaning. Still has some nice details.
I would net it at AG details. Just my humble opinion.
I was thinking a S-58.Not 100% sure.
PS - http://www.thepennylady.com/coinphotogallery.html - you can look at the bottom of the page here to see a really nice business strike 1877....
More than 2k in that condition. I still believe it is a counterfeit, but recommend(as mentioned) you get confirmation from dealers or one of the...
Post a picture of the reverse also.
Closer pictures will be needed. My first thought was counterfeit based off the bold N's.
I can't tell - the glare and the pictures sure do make me think cleaned also. Probably just the pictures.
It is the newcomb variety.
Well I went with 66 - but wavered between 66 and 67. Would not be surprised with a 67 grade. Sure is a beauty.
Why just say it is toned, put it on ebay and it is priceless. :) I agree - that this coin has 0 eye appeal.
I would put the 1888 at VF details. The 1890 I would put AU, but can't tell for sure if that is corrosion on that one spot. The other two are VF...
Yep - head of 1836, small 8 and stars. Looks like it could be an n-14, can really tell - the coronet line looks straight.
I like the coin and say it went back into an AU58 holder.
Still a nice large cent even if it is a details coin. Nice pickups - both of them.
Darn shame about the damage. Repunched dates like this can be pretty cool. And sometimes when taking pictures the angle and the lighting make...
I would probably travel farther for less. :)
Very cool....Thanks for sharing.
Separate names with a comma.
