1928-S AU-50 w/luster, it has wear not just a mushy strike. 1927-S MS-64 BR nice strike for the series. 1931 MS-64 R 1934- MS-65 R 1936- MS-66R
Lol
Pics are way to small...
You've got some nice coins there;)...
ugly
Gotta close up of the date? If everything else is tripled or whatever it is, the date should look the same...
:rolleyes: The 1st question that comes to mind is, why doesn't the date look like liberty?:kewl:
1923-S AU-55 Br. Tough year, but that is wear. 1913 MS63 R. Weak reverse. 1926-D MS-64 Rb. 1917-D MS63 Rb. A disaster date that TPG's will...
I know what your talking about...
Nice find, whats that above the date?
I like it, I agree with 45, but flurting with 50...
That pocket mirror is screaming my name. It would go perfect with my 2009 cent pocket mirrors...Kiss
1925 D & S . This was an embarrassing year for the U.S. Mint...
Got a pic of the reverse? Maybe it is a WAM, but just mislabeled.
Yes, a few months ago I returned a coin to a CT member and he claims he never received it. I guess it just tough luck on my part. Never Again...
http://rotateddies.com/ Unfortunately 1864-L are pretty common with rotation. There is not a great deal of interest and most collectors could...
I don't know squat about them, but the curl in the hair behind the "Y" in liberty seems to be one of the highest points and looks perfect. I would...
Great find Stumpy. Happiness is a small town. I hate noise polution...
There does seem to be something happening with the 1 in the date. The wrapping can fool you though...
The 17 probably has very tiny flakes on it, and the 44-D has a peeled area around liberty, but the crud and the wear make it diffucult to see...
Separate names with a comma.