I'm thinking XF45 at lowest, AU55 at highest, depending on remaining luster, which of course is tough to gauge from photos. The doubled date is...
the 73 S looks counterfeit to me: grainy looking surface, mushy rounded letters, just look at the 2 photos above of the lower reverse and compare...
Congrats, that's a really good looking large cent, good price.
Yes I did, but thanks for the suggestion. I just like them bigger. Old age, I guess.
Here is an 84 CC I have; don't own an 85. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I voted fake, although I would rather have a choice of"probably fake". I don't like the shape of the letters and mintmark on the rev, and the...
Thanks for the generous giveaway!
How about the Connecticut?
[IMG][IMG][IMG][IMG]Don't have anything for '93 or '94 (Yet!)
Hard to read the cheek due to toning, but I think I see some marks. My grade would be 64, but I will guess that it graded 66. I do like the look
..
NIce detail, looks like fresh dies.
SS66's 78S DDR looks genuine from the photos provided. Jack's 78cc can be immediately outed as fake by the type 1 rev. If all you had to go by...
Trying to authenticate Trade Dollars especially circulated or chopmarked examples is often vexing. Allowing for marks from circulation I give this...
Here's mine, also a I/II [IMG][IMG]I believe it has the same die crack on the rev under TRADE DOLLAR as the coin in the OP
76 P PL is fairly common, I believe. The I/II variety is scarce but doesn't command a premium. I think that one's a nice 45. That's a good...
Nice detailed analysis by Publius2. Nothing about the coin shouts "fake" to me , but I think having a specialist examine it would be a good idea.
On the obverse I see signs of a past cleaning, and removal of some crust under the ear.
[IMG][IMG]
Thanks for the recommendation. I don't own a copy as yet, I'm holding out for the definitive Trade Dollar reference, which Joe Kirchgesser has...
Separate names with a comma.
