In fairness, 15 years ago, their photos were really bad. They have gotten much better over the years, but I think their stock setup for their...
I’m sorry, but you can’t grade that coin from those photos. There is so little light, you can’t determine wear from weak strike, toning from...
Looks really clean and in my experience they are kinda lenient on the grading of this improper planchet errors so I say MS66.
MS65 RD
Beaner
Boomshakalaka
The value of this coin is related to the rainbow toning. No matter the numerical grade, the coin is worth $300-$400.
I actually think the opposite, because the 1917 is so common with full head, they should be more stringent in their application of the FH...
MS63 RB
That’s awesome, I need me one of them.
I find it hard to believe that hairline is full, but NGC is much more conservative than PCGS on strike designations. Sometimes photos show...
MS63 not FH
Is that 1920 Pilgrim an NGC MS66 with the serial number 624900-001? I once owned a Pilgrim that looked just like that with the ship sailing on a...
Nope, it was me, literally the furthest person from Doug with respect to grading coins.
The 1921 Peace Dollar is one of the toughest to determine wear vs weak strike, AU vs BU, but this coin has a crusty patina that seems to further...
The coins are certified by NGC, he can't return a different item and get away with it.
+1 Additionally, I factor in “what would E-Bay think?” In this case, the seller would lose 100% of the time. For those who say “who cares,...
My broader point was that a 64-D needs to be premium gem to warrant grading, and this coin doesn’t even appear to be gem.
An I missing something, why is a low grade 64-D in PCGS plastic? The grading fee is more than the value of the coin.
Separate names with a comma.
