Ok fine, it's close to being a 2, call it a 1+.
I sold one that looked almost identical to that coin recently, it was graded MS64.
Not at all, you are expecting a boost because of the date on the coin. Based solely on the toning, the coin is a 1. Some mundane blues, violets,...
On the Morgan scale, that’s a 1
Rick Tomaska (R&I Coins) has purchased at least half a dozen of my coins over the years.
I am a big fan of direct (straight) lighting but axial works well with toned proofs. Since the coin in question is a toned business strike, I...
PF64
PR68
Really? How often do you sell coins on E-Bay? I sell hundreds of coins per year and I would not characterize it as "downright great for...
The reverse looks pretty rough, I'm saying MS63.
That Jefferson is a 3 for me, nice album toning but nothing too spectacular.
That entire passage is unbelievable and the part about NGC & PCGS is ludicrous.
I give it a 3, the surfaces really hold back the coin. This toning on a gem coin would be easy 4, maybe even a 5.
My first impression was AT, but that it’s a proof makes me think maybe the photo is just a little juiced. I’m saying 5 simply because I don’t...
PCGS Price Guide is $10. In reality it’s not even worth that much. I say $5 tops.
+1 It has gem luster but is very baggy, market grade is MS63
Yes, I have. [img]
Yes I still own it, and yes it is still the centerpiece of my collection and is still named the KING. Honestly, this coin belongs in an MS68...
When collecting something other than Morgan Dollars, do you ever compare them to Morgan Dollars? My answer would be no, I compare Jefferson...
I am not trying to be mean, but that is a 1.
Separate names with a comma.
