It’s impossible to grade proofs from photos but I would estimate yours to be in the PR64-65 range as long as there aren’t hidden hairlines or...
I’m not sure why you continue to extrapolate your anecdotal example to declare that the entire Jefferson Registry market has collapsed. It...
4.5 great color, great coverage, nice textile
It is a proof, but I have actually never collected proof Jefferson’s so I’m prolly not the best to expand upon grade or value.
I’m at 3.25 for both of these. Nothing too spectacular on either coin and they both have toning breaks and marks that impact the overall appearance
No, I didn’t like the toning on that coin, have you seen me lowball any other coin in this thread? And the low scores for my nickel weren’t...
Brandon, c’mon man, you were the one who called me petulant for giving your coin a 1.
3.5 Cool textile toning of this magnitude is very desireable.
Who is the seller?
Strange secondary toning No bean
Holy cow: 5.9 If it were MS65 I would give it a 6, those luster grazes on the cheek matter.
I find them on E-Bay mostly, and I have no idea why the star is so elusive, but that is a discussion for another day, gotta get ready for vacation...
I agree, you shoulda won!
We have two that guessed this one right. Personally, I feel the coin would look better in an MS67* holder than MS67+, but thats just me. [img]
I had to go back into my photos and upload all of my old MS63 Morgan photos. [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
When I try that, I get a message box saying that the image is copyrighted by NGC.
If you wish, I am packing now, gonna be on the road soon. Don't you have work to do? Like coins to grade?
Lol
I might cut my losses on this one guys, maybe use it as a gift or even a giveaway item for a future contest.
I am not calling anyone a "rube" rather I am trying to explain how you are treating the members of these forums with less experience and knowledge...
Separate names with a comma.
