I see a coin that was struck by deteriorated dies and suffers from over 40 years of circulation.
Bath was too long? Not pure acetone (nail polish remover)?
Yes, filled. It's due to a chip on the die, and is very common.
If the double date is 1776 1976, it's normal. In order to tell if the dates are actually doubled, we need to see well focused and tightly cropped...
With an attitude like that, you'll be damned lucky to get any help.
Not an error. Circulation damage.
It's better to keep your mouth closed and look the fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
Looks like a 'woody'. It's due to an improper/incomplete mix of the alloy.
Who is Nicole?
I give up. It's missing a clad layer. You should quickly send it off to PCGS for attribution, grading and slabbing.
It's environmental damage. Anything more than that is conjecture.
If you do, don't expect the coin to ever be worth more than face value.
If it can't be seen clearly under 10X magnification, it's not worth seeing.
OK! That last photo proves it. Not missing clad.
[IMG]
Yup.
Perhaps you need to post better photos.
Even with your poor photo, I can tell it's not missing a clad layer. I can see the nickel color that's not hidden by the staining that appears to...
It would only be considered an error if the edge of the printing were off of the paper showing the edge of another note. Yours is not far enough off.
Take your photos with the coin out of the 2X2, and show us the entire coin, not pieces.
Separate names with a comma.
