[IMG][IMG]
[IMG]PR67 CAC[IMG]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
It looks like VF25 wear to me; although the spots and circulation marks might net it down some.
This fellow makes coin photo systems for pretty much any budget:http://www.macrocoins.com/home.html he posts a lot over here:...
[IMG][IMG][IMG][IMG][IMG][IMG]
I think that's a nice 62. Good color, and the marks are well concealed within the devices rather than showing up in the fields. Choice and a good...
Great post, Skyman. Thanks for helping us remember.
Thanks I feel like a fortunate custodian. It has a lot more mint red around the date, and on the rev around the devices, than shows up in my...
Lots of guesses and comments so far, thanks everybody! I'll go ahead and post the grade. Some will be surprised and some not. I wish my...
I have a digital scope too and the lights are arrayed in a circle around the objective. with a coin like a Mercury dime with a fairly high relief...
I struggle to show luster in my photos, especially with oxidized surfaces as here. In hand this coin has full uninterrupted cartwheel. With that...
I'll guess 66, it has massive luster. The only mark I see that amounts to anything is on the eagle's breast (I think)
I'll post the assigned grade tomorrow night around 9 [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Got Froot Loops? [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
45 sounds about right
The 1898 is a fake for sure, compare with any example in the Heritage archives. the 10$ looks fishy but I'll defer to ToughCOINS on that one
Nice, that's a challenging series, always in demand. I just have one, a 58
Separate names with a comma.
