Seeing this reminds me of an observation that I made long ago, but had forgotten. IMO, the coin designs from before the requirement to include "E...
Man, that's extraordinary! What do you think would keep it from being a 65? Is that a rim bump at 12:00? Maybe just a hint of wear on the bear's...
Kinda like a medal that you can spend! Of course we could spend our ASEs for a buck, I guess. "Hey Pop, lend me $30?" "Sure son, here's an AGE for...
Thank you. Appears to be quite easily seen.
Wow, a bunch. Say, could you post a picture of the obverse & reverse? I was curious to see how discernible the clashes are without magnification.
UFL - the post that Monica longed for :cat:!
I believe that you're right. The eyes aren't depicted correctly. At any rate, they look odd. Even so, I'll get the Coin & Chronicles sets :D....
nearest I (Google) found was this: [img] Netherlands East Indies plantation token for 5 liters of rice ca. 1911-1916. Let's see what others come...
Well, if the technology to counterfeit is improving, let's hope that the technology to detect counterfeits is improving more.
I also like the coin, but what's going on in the forehead and cheek? Gimme a 63.
eye appeal plus!
Just another day in Silverburg. Right now up 6¢
If I'd open the boxes, I'd see what the numbers are, but.....
Sorry Stephan, but sounds like a lot of crap to me.....
[MEDIA] "Dont think to much in to this topic." OK, I won't.]
I guess like everyone else, I'll say that it's a cast copy. Detail softened everywhere.
What does the edge reeding look like?
I should look as good at 158! Sheesh, I'm already a VG-F on my way to: [img]
Are you positive that the dots in line aren't caused by other dimes' reeded edges? Are they raised or incuse?
Thread is aptly titled.
Separate names with a comma.
