Again, the TruView hides blemishes on the coin. Take the '65 for example, the TruView in which we used to GTG, hid the dark spot on JFK's...
Agree. In general, I think Tru Views show the coin in it's most flattering "light". I understand it in a way, but I'm not a big fan of them.
LMAO, NO. I needed the laugh this afternoon.
That's kind of what I was thinking.
I really like the fields on that coin Sean. To bad that luster graze is so prominent on Ms. Liberty. Will you buy or sell this one? To the...
66 is what I think it graded. I agree with the sentiment about the left fields. I'd grade it 65. Looks to have great luster.
Man, I voted #1. I didn't care for the spot on her nose, but technically, I thought it was the cleanest. I'm surprised #3 got the highest grade....
66
I like the coin and if you do go to sell it, for sake of liquidity not ROI, I'd get it authenticated (certified) by either NGC or PCGS. As for...
Thank you for the laugh. I needed it this afternoon.
Looks cast to me as well, but that is pure speculation based on the pictures.
I agree that some nice AU's get the bump, but for this coin, if I were the grader, I would not do it. IMO, there is simply too much chatter that...
MS63
These are hard to judge in photos because of the weak strikes. Lots of chatter on the devices and fields on the obverse. I see hairlines in both...
No worries. I wasn't really sure what you were after. Here's a link indicating PCGS will designate PL on Morgans (which I'm sure you already...
But that was my premise.
Yes I have many times. IMO, getting a PL or DPL designation is much different than a point or two difference on the current grading scale.
Now that is a problem...
@carboni7e , the steel wheatie sure is pretty in MS67! I own 2 P, D, S sets in that grade. I really like yours.
Don't worry, there are still St. Gauden's available in the market ;)
Separate names with a comma.
