Well, to be honest, I think I have to count moving as a hobby. [IMG] I'm doing it again.
Excellent find
Somehow when I posted the above, I kinda expected you to come back with some denial right off. But I tried. If you just want to not believe...
Unless your grandfather got this brand new in 1921, and he, your father and you never washed it in the 98 years since then, there is always the...
Gonna say 64 for the Morgan and 65BN for the Lincoln.
Yeah, most are. But people don't just collect modern nickels from change because they are only worth a nickel. Assembling a date and mint set from...
Love Jeffies! Very collectible.
So you had a towel. But was it around you and how many Morgans and Franklins did you scoop up, considering you had no pockets to put any in?
Guess that "super talented haters" must now be a complement indicating we know coins and told you the truth rather than fawn all over the coin...
Let me see it when it's been slabbed that way by either PCGS or NGC.
Not an error.
http://www.error-ref.com/multiple-machine-doubling-in-one-direction/
I'm not really upset at all. I don't truly care if after striking (figures just for example) a million of any one coin (say for example a 1990 P...
The real error is the mint overusing dies and overall poor quality once dies go past a certain time.
Another good month
Your eyes are crossed. Not an error.
Say what you will, that is a beauty and the improper alloy area actually looks quite appealing, all things considered.
The only thing I can think of that warrants a 62 is that might just be the highest MS grade they will give to any cent with an improper alloy....
That is why I went MS63, thought it could be a 64 without that.
No. Not only "No" to it being an experimental coin, but no to any 1930 Lincoln cent having a memorial reverse. It is not possible. This is...
Separate names with a comma.
