No your coin is damaged after it left the Mint.
Damage.
clad quarters can weigh a little more or a little less. Yours is in mint tolerable variance.
Looks normal, weight is normal also.
no with those pictures it looks like Machine doubling. But in the future whole pictures of the coin on both sides help.
It look's like an ancient best bet would be to post better photos and put it on the ancient forum to get better help.
Same reason this exist...
I'll take a stab at it. Xf-45
Looks like to me there is a difference on the R of America.
Normal large date 1982 d Lincoln. The one that everyone is been going crazy trying to find a third example "that means very rare" is the 1982...
Looks like a lamination error mixed with feeder finger error but I'm not sure. Pretty cool looking. I'm sure someone with more knowledge will pop...
Looks normal to me. Here is a link to another thread of one I found. I hope it helps....
Both photos look grayish so can't really tell. Try taking another pic using more light. Do you have a scale?
I always liked the way DCAM looked so when I seen this I had to bid on it. I got it in the mail today. This is my birth year so I think I'm going...
Ok my choice is #1. When I was a kid a similar coin was given to me I was probably 8-9 years old from a dad of a friend at that age, he gave me a...
Entry post (Edit: numismatic post and prize choice below.)
lol yeah so do I but in horseshoe and hand grenades who's the winner:p
incuse I look at it now and see that it was hit so hard by a counterstamp on the obverse that it transferred to the reverse.
I'm not a big fan of the design.
Lol I guess I misunderstood the title I thought the op may have been asking if it was a s over a d. As others have said large date.
Separate names with a comma.
