Follow that link that gbroke posted "Here is my setup" Try to mimic that setup exactly and then with a little practice you'll start producing very...
Probably because the spread is so spectacular. Even a blind person could see it.
150
I didnt notice what you said above the two photos before I typed a reply. And after I noticed what you said it answered my question so I deleted...
AU, probably 58 as Lyds has said.
LOL!
That doesn't look like a die break, looks more like a cat hair from the photo. I'd put this at an AU55
I agree with aubade - VF, possibly details.
XF45
.
Furryfrog is right, they have just worn off from circulation. The cuts are known as a "reeded edge"
55/58
The first thing I thought of was that it had been struck through capped dies and has just seen a good amount of circulation since then.
Not too sure on the 72. I've seen quite a few coins like that, though. The dies may have been misaligned.
The 1962 looks like a lamination. The first one is interesting. Not sure what may have caused it or if it is an actual error or PMD.
Underneath the Y in LIBERTY, are those not crisscrossing die polish lines? [ATTACH]
Looks like either MD or the result of die deterioration. A picture of the entire reverse would help.
AU Details
Why would you report it?
Forgot to mention the 48 is an NGC 64 no line fatty holder.
Separate names with a comma.
