It's unfortunately about Jefferson's jawline. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
This is definitely one of the best designs on the classic commems I believe.
Cool demo. How would the TPG's view this coin now?
#1 AU 59 #2 MS 64
That example you posted as a MS 63 looks more like a 61 or at best a 62. Your particular coin looks nice but a little strange. I would need more...
VF 20/25
Yeah that first set of pictures make it look cleaned. But those new pictures make it look like a really nice coin.
Correct numerical grade only = 1 point Correct color designation only = 1 point Correct numerical grade AND correct color designation = 3 points 1...
Zero points, that's how many.
The exact opposite. Getting points for a correct answer, you know, the way everything has been scored forever.
I know oil and water don't mix. I think that's something everyone realizes when they're about 2 years old.
Oil and water definitely mix.
No, you're not. The scoring just doesn't make any sense.
1 - MS 64 RB 2 - MS 66 BN 3 - PR 64 BN 4 - PR 66 RB 5 - MS 65 BN
The way the scoring is set up makes no sense.
That blue-green coloration is verdigris. Try soaking it in olive oil for a few days then thoroughly rinsing it with distilled water.
Looks like it's been cleaned. Detail wise I'd put it at F12 or F15.
So here it is. I know it may look like a no date but the is a two visible there and it's in the ones place for the date. There were no 1922 or...
Yeah that might be important. It's a 1942 P
I have a very heavily circulated Walking Liberty half. It's definitely lower than the AG03 that's shown on the PCGS Photograde app so I'd say it's...
Separate names with a comma.
