Just remembered I have pics of these guys: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Here are a few: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Everyone should pay particular attention to item IV, Transfer Dies. That's the wave of the counterfeiting future; when skillfully done, very very...
TIF's suggestion that the Ann Arbor dealer simply accepts NGC submissions is almost certainly correct. Your post seems needlessly belligerent in...
Oddly enough, that's exactly what the ravens say about humans!
The numismatic world dearly needs the creation of RPC Vol. 0 that would cover coins like this from the various quaestors and duovirs and other...
I have an example of the OP coin, but no pic. Here are a couple of Brutus quinarii I haven't posted before: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [IMG]
Here's one that hasn't been shown yet: [ATTACH]
My example, ex-Santamaria: [ATTACH]
My only veiled Caesar: [ATTACH]
And here are a few coins of very different style, placed by Crawford within the catch-all 44/5 rubric along with Carausius' coin. Steve Brinkman...
Don't be too hard on the seller of your coin for his misattribution; this confusion between 44/5 and 53/2 is very very common. The weight of your...
Some non-portrait Caesars: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
A couple of mine: [ATTACH] [IMG]
Some more Mark Antonys: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
The OP coin is ex CNG 78, lot 1339, 14 May 2008. That was Part II of the Richard Prideaux Collection of Augustus. That was a nice collection,...
This thread resembles a game of telephone, lol! The abbreviation in question is GMRH, not GMBH.
Modest, discreetly placed bankers' marks needn't even detract much from the price. I don't think for instance that the mark above the ship on this...
Googling GMRH ancient coins discloses other ex-BCD items with the same notation. Their dates range from May 1979 to October 1984. I can't shed...
One of the few Imperial coins I sort of regret selling, mostly because of the marvelous Medusa medallion on Probus' cuirass: [IMG]
Separate names with a comma.
