When you get the "we looked everywhere", doesn't that mean that ebay removed it? Otherwise I thought you get the "listing removed by seller", but...
The answer of course is it's up to you! I think it makes it more interesting. I've been collecting the reverse transition varieties of Barber...
Seems like the days of having a formal dining room with the "good china" are mostly gone, hence little demand for it. But maybe that's still going...
NGC designates 1870-72 as "rev of 69", I believe it's the same as the "shallow N."
Pictures without so much glare would help. Obverse looks cleaned.
Quite a few sold over the past five years. I'll say $240k.
Members can visit without logging in and show up as "guest" too, right? I do it all the time on other forums where I'm a member but don't log in...
That's awesome, I hadn't noticed that. It's a Sponsored listing on ebay as well. I can report it until I'm blue in the face or just move on I guess.
Ebay doesn't care. The seller ended the previous listing so they could lower their asking price. There's some magic sauce with reporting...
Finally dragged mine out for pictures. Not sure how I ended up with two 1949-D. 1958-61 were LCS purchases around 1973, $1.50 each. [ATTACH]...
Whack-A-Mole
Do you have a better picture of the SVDB obverse? MM is correct for position #4 but it looks like significant gouging around it. The image posted...
[ATTACH]
Has to be 9. The top of an 8 is very oblong. [ATTACH]
Here's the TrueView. [ATTACH] I can definitely see the AU58 in this one, but not the OP coin. Numismedia says $38. It's a topsy-turvy world out...
I like how you got a quadruple reflection.
The only way to find out is to submit it. I have no idea how a TPG determines a coin blank versus a slug. Here's a great article on the process....
Perhaps mine was meant to be a dime slug. I did not think to compare it with a dime since it's copper, but it's probably close to the 17.9mm...
Separate names with a comma.
