I had the opportunity to upgrade my proof war nickel from a 65 to a 67. [ATTACH]
For 1916-24, pretty much.
Congratulations!
Good to hear that it was an unintentional lighting side-effect, and that the coin looks better than what you photographed at first.
Weird. Is the bit on the coin some sort of raised gunk or corrosion, or is it discoloring that's smooth and flush with the coin's surface? Your...
One's on my shopping list, but the date, condition, and price have to be right.
VG10. Not sure it would grade due to the mess with the cheek and the bites taken out of the obverse rim at 5-6:00
I don't think it's deliberate etching as much as it is simply incidental environmental damage. Perhaps it's a dug coin, and the soil was...
Poke it with a stick. See if it comes off.
On the other hand, I hear there important London collectors offering big bucks for weight variations like this. ;)
82-S isn't as common in PL or DMPL as 80-S and 81-S, but it's a unique date in that many have very deep fields. The curvature of the fields on...
There weren't officially plans to make the 1884 or 85 proofs, as they were off the books and not even known until the early 20th century. I don't...
1899 was released in quantity during the Treasury sale in the 1960s. There was also a bunch of hoard coins that came to light in the 1950s....
Separate names with a comma.
