Why don't ya'll just stone me while you're at it. OK, well, here are some real Nero's (I think) [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] :
OK, I'm game.
Ain't that the truth.
I did right after I received it and at that point I could have returned it, but it's been weeks since I got this and I just got the bad news from...
Wake up man. Wake up. Yeah, I wasted good money after bad on this one. Sometimes ignorance is bliss.
A couple of my other Diocletian's [ATTACH] DIOCLETIAN Antoninianus OBVERSE: IMP DIOCLETIANVS AVG, radiate, cuirassed bust right REVERSE: IOVI...
Perhaps, but when you add in the cost of David Sear's opinion, it's approaching the point of diminishing return.
All of those are nice coin JA, but $10 for that Maximinus II is really the bomb. Also the detail on the Galerius, six-pack and junk, is really nice.
Just don't get too big of a head. [ATTACH]
As are we all!!
I always like a reverse where the facial features are visible of whichever god. In this case, Genius does have a face.
I still have a few coins to show from my spending spree in March. This one is a very pretty Diocletian AE Follis still showing some of the silver...
Those are all nice Nemo.
I think it's probably too late for that, but anywho, I want to keep it for study and to remind me.
OK, the documentation arrived this afternoon. So without further ado, David Sear says it is a 19th century cast fake. B U M M E R But it is...
Never has the truth been spoken so eloquently.
RARE!
I did not see this statement when I first looked. I was too busy checking the attribution. I'll tell you like I tell my wife when she says this...
Anytime my coin friend.
RIC 18a is correct. It includes several officiana including Gamma. Take a look at Helvetica's ID pages....
Separate names with a comma.
