I would take #2. It is probably the pictures, but #1 does nit look like it has any luster left.
I am sorry. I thought I brought the pictures with me, but they are not here. I don't know where they went. I guess you will have to wait until...
Nickels are not my thing, but 65?
This one and http://www.cointalk.com/t127839/ will be ending tomorrow. I am not sure just when I will get the next up (hopefully tomorrow, but no...
This one and http://www.cointalk.com/t127840/ will be ending tomorrow. I am not sure just when I will get the next up (hopefully tomorrow, but no...
Well DOH!
Because those are great pictures of the coin he is selling and that IS THE coin he is selling in "the main title". Secondly, he did post the...
HUH? If "this information" means the current book values (someday someone is going to tell me which book to get THE book value from), you are...
I have said nothing about this particular coin, just 1917's in general. However, if anyone has a chance to get a very well struck 1917 (or even...
I am willing to set it up howsoever you guys desire at least withing some bounds of reasonableness. What I will start objecting to is redoing and...
No, I am not. That email says "to help buyers and sellers". Try it. You might like it.
From what i can gather, it is pretty much set up against the seller right now. Sorry, but that seems to be a fact. You are in over where I can...
Like you say, "There are so many ways to look at this." There is not right or wrong, but infinite shades of gray. Anywho, as it stands now,...
TY I have a lot more to be posted - particularly if they ever get the albums fixed.
See my reply in http://www.cointalk.com/t127516/ Also, this is why I posted the thread http://www.cointalk.com/t121891/
And the 1917's have everything that does plus a hairy ear. Look at Heritage's best (MS-67's and 68's). The 1917's have more and better details.
Here is what that would give you; Correction cort'd score 0.915 0.416 ddoomm1 0.381 23 1.000 0.429 bahabully 0.429 30 0.977 0.473 Leadfoot...
Does not handle numbers >1 (there are lots in fact most), does not relate to scores and IMHO, over corrects for the number of guesses. I am not...
Is that a weak strike that they graded XF?
Separate names with a comma.
