Ya, I think so and those images look nothing like coppercoins .
Just more crazy stuff from the error companies . Wexler doesn't match coppercoins, but wexlers matches coneca and has no cross-reference from...
Funny, this isn't the only DDO where cross-references are wrong . Take a look at wexlers 1962, 42-46 for DDO http://www.doubleddie.com/307701.html...
If someone has a cherry-picker guide, check who has the right description for this DDO .. Could be wexler and coppercoins, or coneca ?
And neither coppercoins or wexler description matches coneca, or markers either, at that rate .
Ya, I know . Theses error companies all have their own way of doing things, I guess .
Tommy, I took some new images for you on coneca DDO-001 . There's nothing to match them to, but lets get started . First is a image of the 10th...
It's just a worn die, thats all ...
Here's coneca cherry-picker number for DDO-001 : 1-O-II-C+VI; FS-01-1984D-101 (039) Here's coppercoins cross reference for coneca cherry-picker...
Make sure the die cracks are on the columns as in coneca markers description .
Tommy, this is coneca DDO-002 . Just check the description and you will see . Coneca DD0-001 has nothing to do with the bottom of the profile...
Concea DDO-001 is different then anything wexler or coppercoins has listed . Markers and descriptions are much different on wexler and coppercoins...
copied twice, so I deleted this post ...
Tommy, the markers and description on coneca are different then Wexer & coppercoins .
OP says its raised in the field not sure if its coming out of an indent, caused from a die dent .
Heres images concea DD0-002...
I put a circle around the area in question...
Tommy, heres coneca DDO-001...
Strike through are recessed and die dents are raised
http://www.error-ref.com/die-dent/
Separate names with a comma.
