I see the rub, but that is not the question. I have coins with "obvious" rubs graded as MS and a couple I find no rub, but are "AU". I will...
That is PMD. Someone hit the 7.
1878 Morgan - MS60 (I cannot see AU, so it must be MS something.) 1938-D Buffalo - MS64 1943-D Dime - MS67FB
I am not having any problems.
According to Lange's Lincoln Cents, "Most [31-S's] have less than perfect strikes." I have also noted that most 31-S obverses are mushy strikes.
Too bad about those nicks on the reverse. That would be one nice coin without them.
Now that I see the reverse, it is a fake. Look at those wheat tips. I would strongly suggest do not just not pay. At the very least you need to...
Not die gouges.
I am guessing you are correct. The $4,795 has been listed since 7/11/10 or at least I assume it was 2010 since they do not list the year.
I do not see anything to tell me it is fake, but it sure looks cleaned to me.
FWIW, that is against eBay rules
I would have to see it in hand to know if it had enough luster, but from what I can make out, 66 BN.
1950-S PCGS slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.
1950-D PCGS slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.
Best I can see, no one changed a bit. Top 10. Columns are rank, name, average, and number of guesses. bahabully 0.229 50 Leadfoot 0.333 47...
I really think you nailed this one. 75% picked it as 66. Never seen one this high. What else can I say.
Just about mark free. Actually so mark free, this one even is a bit lower in luster than most 67's. BTW, no one asked, but that mark behind...
Switch what? Switch the coin in the slab? Cannot be done. Substitute another coin and slab. Easily detectable. I guarantee you there is not...
The seller says, "This coin is certified by P.C.G.S S- 127 E.F. 45 !!!!" How is that confusing?
Uhm? Might be!
Separate names with a comma.
