@Paul Garland Fred happens to be the exception, but the vast majority of dealers don't know squat about numismatic errors. Chris
Welcome to the neighborhood @AvidCoinster ! As a suggestion, you should try to start each thread in the appropriate forum whenever possible. It's...
You must have posted the close-up in a different thread or the thread of someone else. Do you have a link to it? Chris
I can't from that photo. Can you give us a better close-up? Chris
Ditto, ditto, ditto! Chris
That's not even close to the actual doubling on the righthand base of the "2". Did you even check for the markers? Chris
The first two look like PMD, not worth saving. Chris
I'm not so sure about the clash. Wouldn't that be somewhere to the right of Georgie's head? Does anyone have an overlay? Chris
I don't think so. Where are the markers? Chris
It can't possibly be a dime planchet because the legend would be missing the top of the letters in IGWT on the obverse or E PLURIBUS UNUM on the...
The third image is a minor clash and is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it. The first two images appear to be PMD. Chris
You mean PMD, don't you? Post-mint damage....yes! Welcome to the neighborhood! Chris
Only the best VAMpires are able to attribute their specimens without going totally bonkers. It's unfortunate that the Van Allen/Mallis book,...
If you ignore him, maybe he will go away. Chris
Welcome to the neighborhood @Cajun Coin Hunter ! I assume it must be a die crack which is so darn common on Lincolns (including crappy Zincolns)...
Nope, for the coin! Yep, for losing it! Chris:)
I think it started at the corner and went through the "I" to the rim. There is no evidence that it traveled the length of the roof. Chris
I don't see any signs of doubling. Chris
I think P&G gave you your answer. However, you can see the Blakesley Effect on the rim near the "0" of the date. Chris
CONECA made some intentional errors for their 25th Anniversary. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Chris
Separate names with a comma.
