All past the test.
I got six of these, each different date, yes I'd say proof.
It seem like I take a chance each time I purchase anything these days.
The first thing I did was weigh it but you know these days we buy with knee jerk reactions then question our reasoning. The piece just looked...
I picked this up along with a 1960 Washington, both proofs. A couple bucks each. Now I wonder and with your expertise, is it a real piece or not....
Thank you.................
That is great info in comparing an "L" with non-"L". I will check on this when I get home, thank you.
The Buffaloes have dates that I can make out and the Lincolns are good too. Did not think about the detail grade. I want to have someone look...
But I wonder, although the collar of one runs past and to the left of the "1", the real 1864 L must have the pointed collar and not be rounded...
I am a poor picture taker [ATTACH]
Went to a garage sale over the weekend. The person had a bag of coins, mostly Buffaloes, Lincolns and a couple of Indian Heads. Picked up the bag...
Paddy54, just to be clear, are you saying it would not be considered a FS because of the, what I would call, "smoothed" area around the third step...
The Constantius II great looking piece.
I clearly feel it's a high MS just makes me feel good that I could pick out a VAM.
Sent my 1880 Morgan off and just got it back. What I thought was, IS ! I'm getting better as a newbie to the group but a long way to go. Thanks to...
Absolutely it should, but subjective grading could hinder it. Depends one the ones who look at it. That I don't like.
If one is 66 why should the other not grade the same, each has spectacular lines even down to the feather on the back of the head.
It's so the uninformed don't get it the first time........
Buyer Beware, you get what you pay for. Does it say "PL" or "DMPL", well then it ain't.
Is the coin like this 1958, with top part of this "8" filled ?[ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
