The 78 and 79 are just worn dies with a little bit of MD. The 76 is a normal cent well within tolerance, 2.98 - 3.24 I have given you this list...
I think we will call @messydesk and @Morgandude11
There is a large scratch (damage) next to the N in ONE on the reverse. The obverse has toned differently because part of it was more exposed to...
If the second C is actually touching the wreath, then you have 2 to choose from, VAM 2 or 11. The date position should tell you which one. Use the...
Keep it as a reference piece. The obverse is probably a series of linear plating blisters. Also,the copper plating is applied so thinly over the...
Egypt 50 Piastres 2010 [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Try reading my post #2. It is in easily understandable English even for you. But you will have to read it quick as you will be gone pretty soon
[ATTACH]
I already reported his post #7.
Read and compare here http://www.lincolncentresource.com/smalldates/1982.html
Try reading this and comparing. See if it is more understandable, it might be http://www.lincolncentresource.com/smalldates/1970Ssmalldate.html
Denmark 25 Ore 1926 [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
MS 64 PL
If you are referring to USofA, it looks like machine or strike doubling. No added value to these. Is the obverse as good as the reverse? Nice...
300 Years commemorative of the Norwegian Royal Mint [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Norwegian 25 Kroner 1970[ATTACH] commemorative with 2 kings
They took the time to create perfect rims, highly polished dies and a double strike for a perfect finish. Sadly, the position of Quality control...
MS 66 and I think if it was submitted to PCGS you got away with an FS designation
I was replying just to provoke some replies. I am not American, do not live in the USA and know very little about early American coinage, so I...
The first 7 in the first image was a 2 changed to a 7. Bottom of the 2 sticks out either side and the surface looks to have been "roughed up" to...
Separate names with a comma.
