No, but I am not sure if that means some are still grandfathered in or that they can still join unverified.
+1
Anyone for 68? That way we would cover the entire gamut!
I like that 36, Shoewrecky. I have posted this one before, but this is a better pic. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
1878 - early Morgan? Thanks for the contest!
Here is one. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
1929-d PCGS slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
1929- PCGS slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
UHM? You were. I was not. Every post I made was talking about a woody - not as in the 35-D.
I know this is supposed to be for posting our coins, but if someone will buy this for me, it will be mine and I will post more pictures!...
That is definitely a woody. Not too shabby!:thumb:
Nope. I missed what green said. I listed the eBay fees. I am pretty sure PayPal is limited to $10,000 (or less) so it will not do much good...
Not really. 0.11 * 50 = $5.50 0.06 * 950 = $57.00 0.02 * 79000 = $1580 total = $1642.50 Oh!, and he gets a 20% discount. Therefore, he only...
Although Doug will disagree, from what I have been able to make out, it is not that the alloy CAUSES the color change. It is merely that the...
Assuming his math is correct (1129# and 75% silver), he has over $350,000 worth of just the silver metal - that is zero numismatic value. I would...
Now that one is sharp!!!
I am not sure if you thinking as a youth is in the minority or majority, but you are/were far from the only one to think that way. Consequently,...
you mean like this one;...
I would call that a 64, but a TPG might say 63 due to the wood grain. I would think it might go for as much as $30.
It has been a while! [ATTACH][ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.