You only have 135 post over there and your what's known as a " Rookie " by their standards ...
Here's another quote for ya , Probably because they said au58.
Well, I took it over to Pcgs forums and so far one " laugh out loud " . With many more to come ....
Just pick this one up yesterday [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Your so full of BS, it's actually getting quite funny .............. [ATTACH]
I'm in the mint state with this one ( 64-65 ) .. I don't think it will hit red ...
Isn't that the memorial, clashed across lincoln chest ..
I still say Coneca #7 and there's that die scratch again . [ATTACH]
I went over to wexler site, but mostly closeups . That doesn't help out any ...
Here's the OMM not that one either . [ATTACH]
It isn't #1 look at the placement of the " D " between the top of the " D " and the branch . Spacing is way different . [ATTACH] Now here's...
Does your mint-mark have a die scratch running through it . [ATTACH] But I don't think it's this one
Coneca has no D/S for this year and mint-mark . http://varietyvista.com/09b%20WQ%20Vol%202/RPMs%201950-D.htm I also think I see the marker for...
I tried to find out what happen, but his jaw broken .
RPM #7 http://varietyvista.com/09b%20WQ%20Vol%202/RPM%20Detail%20Pages/1950DRPM007.htm
Does it look like this one [ATTACH]
My dad 81 and he would run them over, no kidding either ...
Thanks for stopping by Bill ...
Far date http://coinsandcanada.com/coins-prices.php?coin=1-cent-1896&years=1-cent-1876-1901
Nice change find ....
Separate names with a comma.
