[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
True. I just seldom buy 20th c coins that aren't high ms. So I didn't even think of that. But any circulated coin below high au doesn't look right...
Dipped properly and a coin that should be dipped doesn't ruin a coin. A circulated 19th c coin should NEVER be dipped. An uncirculated coin with...
Looks like a bag toner. It toned in the mint bag. From what I see so far it looks like a ms 63 with a monster reverse
Killer reverse. Can you post better pics of the obverse too please
From those pics I thought they were a pair of 64s. The first might have been a high end 63 but I can't quite tell from the pics
The color of the first is a lot nicer in hand. Original slate gray
This has a good chance of a proof like designation hard to tell from pics. Many 1879-81-s Morgan dollars are proof like to some degree. I'd call...
That makes sense. Seeing it in hand is a lot different then a pic a lot of times
That was luck at a small estate auction raw a few years ago. This one graded and beaned already was a touch over $900 and I bought it for resale....
True about the strike. I won't 100% say without seeing in hand if the op coin hasn't been dipped or lightly cleaned in the past either the halos...
I think there's a bit more wear in the hair. And on the reverse especially on 1. Tho these are known for strike issues too. I could change my...
Pr 64 on the liberty. I'm not sure if it's a cam from the pic. From the pic I say no but it's close. In hand I could change my mind Ms 65 on Isabella
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] This a 53 and I thought accurately graded
Lower ms. I'm at 62 myself
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Twins :)
Got 2 now of the exact same coin o-109 in vf 30 pcgs cac
Separate names with a comma.
