More than one resource says that there were likely MPL's made in 1917. I will swear that I have seen one cerified on Heritage, but it is not...
ldhair still holding the lead and little has changed below him - again. Top 10. Columns are rank, name, average, and number of guesses....
Yes, the obverse has great luster. It is a bit chippy, but I could see a 67 with that luster. Yes, the marks on the reverse are barely visible....
A good solid strike, and the only ticks I see are on his shoulder and below AMERICA. However, this one just does not have the luster (mostly the...
1944-S NGC slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
1939- PCGS slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
[ATTACH][ATTACH]
This and http://www.cointalk.com/t207005/ will be ending tonight.
This and http://www.cointalk.com/t207006/ will be ending tonight.
FWIW, there are no stains on this coin. The temple and cheek are nothing more than shadows and the "stain" on the reverse is a shiny spot.
ty
OOPS! Got it! TY
ldhair continues his lead. rzage moved in from of Shoewrecky, but there were no dramatic changes this week either. Top 10. Columns are rank,...
Nice color and luster. The strike is not too bad. However, it is just a bit too "chippy" to go with a 67, so they gave it a 66. [ATTACH]
This is about as nice a 67 as I have. Great luster, a real solid strike, and about nick free. To my naked eye, the only flaw I can see is a spot...
1935-D PCGS slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
1921- NGC slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
There are hardly any marks (nicks) on the reverse to stick out. So, no, they are not particularly noticeable.
This and http://www.cointalk.com/t206869/ will be ending tomorrow night.
This and http://www.cointalk.com/t206870/ will be ending tomorrow night.
Separate names with a comma.
