??????
ldhair still leads and Leadfoot coming up behind, but we finally got the pot stirring a bit. Lincoln Cents joined the top in at the #4 position....
I swear that obverse would make a solid 67. Strike and luster are all there. There are only a couple tiny marks not visible to the naked eye....
Strike, luster, and nicks are not a problem. Were that the only criteria, this would be a solid 66. However, there are many light blotches on...
Note: I got a new camera I am still playing with. Please excuse any problems with the pictures. Also, no new round this Wednesday. 1952- NGC...
Note: I got a new camera I am still playing with. Please excuse any problems with the pictures - and this coin was particularly difficult to...
?????
????
???
??
I tried soaking one (as a test) and it made it look like it had been acid washed in about a day.
This and http://www.cointalk.com/t207750/ will be ending tonight. Assuming I can add pictures, I will start another round.
This and http://www.cointalk.com/t207751/ will be ending tonight. Assuming I can add pictures, I will start another round.
HUH? How does this fit?
counterfeit
Why can I no longer add pictures from the icon above? On firefox, the select button is not functional and on Explorer, I get nothing.
@ $1600 insurance with signature confirmation, he would be lucky to get it that cheap. Registered will set him back $24.00. So, yes, $20 is...
The MM looks right, but those pictures are too small to say anything for certain. Try looking here - http://www.cointalk.com/t78043/. Pay...
Back to Lincolns
I am not sure about that wide, but ranged can be searched. I have a search for Lincolns 1909 through 1929 and a second search for 1930 through 1958.
Separate names with a comma.