I think I caught the reverse, but I missed most of the obverse. It is much more blue.
Got one!
I will go with a 45.
Their new "request" is that the pictures be at least 1600 on one side and at least 90 quality. They have gone to larger pictures.
808 707 252
OOPS! gbroke beat me. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
Here is a 1 and a 6 [ATTACH][ATTACH]
Back in May. See http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/currstamps.html
Slight problem there. They say "coin" and that is exactly what they mean. They do not count bullion as "coin". ***** a lot. Maybe we can...
If it is slabbed genuine (or details) by NGC, PCGS, ANACS, OR ICG, it is good to list for as much as you want.
Aside from the fact that does not explain the denticles, a proof with that poor a strike? Not in my imagination.
FWIW, and these are not exactly my area, both of those are beyond question fakes IMO. The 1877 has a strong N, and funky denticles on both sides....
It has not, but I doubt that will convince you otherwise.
It absolutely does! I still think if someone had to add a note (i.e SGS is noted for NOT being able to grade.) the end rfesult would be better...
I just got this in my mail. I am not sure I am upset or even disagree - so long as the public understands what to expect from these TPG's (they...
I cannot tell if it is a counterfeit or just an added "S", but it definitely is not a real 1909-S VDB
FWIW, Mike Diamond also says it is PMD.
Sorry! Misread it.
wrong show.
I think it is ex-jewelry. That front left rim was added AFTER minting.
Separate names with a comma.
