I'll take a stab: the 1879 looks high AU to me (unless what I perceive as loss of luster is incorrect, in which case about MS62-63) 1879-cc:...
OK, first coin- I agree XF since the luster seems confined to just around the devices- very little wear to be seen. Second coin- AU53-55, again...
I'm really enjoying this report. Look forward to more if you survive your encounter with "da bomb" 1794 LC!
That's a jaw-dropper coin, for sure! Thanks for posting!
Great looking coin with full details-- congrats!
I don't see any sign of wear; I'd say 63 minimum, maybe 64.
If the edge is reeded, it's a fake for sure. Just looking at the devices, much is fat/mushy and the portrait looks recut in a number of areas....
Disclaimer: I'm no Morganologist. But I'll try: 1) EF-40 2) AU-50 3)MS-64
Love the details on that one, very nice.
VERY nice, original looking coin.
That is a very nice example, Eduard. A lot of detail left on that coin, and few planchet problems. I like the doubled 1 in the ate (repunched?) A...
Sometimes it's good to "go with your gut."
I'm afraid I have to agree with the majority.
Wouldn't that be a hoot- if non-VAMs turn out to be rare?
If the coin was lightly circulated before being put away, it may only lose luster on the high points (cheek, eagle breast and wingtips) and still...
Nice coins with well-executed designs, history, and AFFORDABLE. What's not to like?
It can be hard to tell from photos if a coin has been cleaned abrasively. I suggest taking a point source light, such as an LED flashlight, and a...
Well, that's very nice. I'm sure it will be a valued part of your collection because of the association. Collectors seem to be a pretty generous...
Nice detail on that one, also you can see a die clash at around 7 on the reverse. I don't find the dig too distracting, but I am afraid I don't...
Very nice! I like that subtle toning and the way FDR's profile is sort of cameo'd by it. Well done!
Separate names with a comma.
