[quote="rlm's cents, post: 1540083"]1929-D PCGS slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted. The dark are in...
[quote="rlm's cents, post: 1540083"]1926-S PCGS slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
This and http://www.cointalk.com/t214355/ will be ending tonight.
This and http://www.cointalk.com/t214356/ will be ending tonight.
With a population of only 7 and none better, what do you want him to do?
I would guess 64. Too bad about that scratch. The rest of the coin is sure clean.
[ATTACH][ATTACH][ATTACH][ATTACH]
Already slabbed.
OOPS! Irish2Ice missed a couple. Problem is, most everyone else did also. Columns are rank, name, average, and number of guesses....
Great strike, great luster and only a few small nicks. But there are those spot and they do not look fresh (to me with my limited experience)....
Great strike, great luster and a several small nicks. Sounds like a nice 66 and that is what I would give it. There are just too many nicks for...
1950-S NGC slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
1936-D PCGS slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
[ATTACH][ATTACH]
This and http://www.cointalk.com/t214094/ will be ending tonight.
This and http://www.cointalk.com/t214096/ will be ending tonight.
Aside from war time nickels, they are 75% copper and 25% nickel.
It sure looks like one, but I would guess that it is not due to improper alloy mix.
That 26-S must be awfully drab because it sure is clean for a 63. That 23-S is worth more than a couple bucks also. What happened to your 14-S?
How did I miss this thread. Anyway - ....... and many more!
Separate names with a comma.