Not at all. Quite pleasing as a matter of fact. :)
Can't see why not. :)
These two guys have spent a few years traveling in my front pocket, along with the car keys, pocket knife, and compatriots of sort. Updated...
Another gal no worse for wear.......:) Keep 'em coming guys.
It's just a good way to display what you like, as well as protecting what you like.......:)
How the devil did I miss this thread? :) Gotta stop stayin' up late at nite. [ATTACH]
Featured to boot.........most worthy. :)
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Lucky for you. [ATTACH]
Love it Paddy. Capital find......
My middle name........
The trick is, is to get it mint sealed..........Denver (Bob, or otherwise) don't do proofs for that year........
Your huddled masses of forgotten coinage yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming collection. Send these, the homeless,...
Heck......harken back to the 'old' days when we'd pick things out of the change, regardless of condition, and place them into albums. No drama....
It ain't a coin? What is it? And like 'Paddy' mentioned above, it looks to be a bit of drunkin' revere........
Skunked again........didn't see that coming. :)
Holy mackerel. Is the series out of print?
Just sayin', I don't think it's as ugly as a '61 or '62. There are some detracting mark on the devices (obverse) but the reverse is virtually...
'64 but I think PCGS gave it a 'boot' up to '65 because of the lovely lilting colours......:)
From what I understand, it was cheaper for the mint to produce 99% coin blanks than the 90% ones. Go figure...........
Separate names with a comma.
