Which one? Chris
The Mint stopped hand-punching the mintmark into the working die about 1990, so this could not be an RPM. Chris
I just noticed this 1836 medal that you posted. I have the same medal, but mine does not have "HART" & "FECIT" at the bottom of the obverse....
Remind the kids that telling too many people about their collections can result in robbery or theft. That "so-called" friend could be a thief or...
Don't drag me into this, Frank. I have enough trouble arguing with the other imbeciles. [ATTACH] Chris
@Pop70 Have you considered purchasing a Mint Set or Proof Set for each birth year? At least then, if some of the children have no interest in...
It looks damaged to me, too. Maybe someone used a hammer on it because the flat spot @12:00 on the obverse does not line up with the flat spot...
I don't see any doubling. Chris
[ATTACH]
Just what we need! One more edited person. Chris
You need to grow a thicker skin. No way was @furryfrog02 being nasty. Chris
Are you asking us to find one for you? Chris
You need to learn which years are applicable for WAM's & [ATTACH] http://www.lincolncentresource.com/wideams.html Chris
Like *furry* said, most are so minor that it's hard to see them. Chris
The 1958 is really cool because the date just barely made it. Chris
It looks like someone started "spooning" it but gave up. Chris
If I were a Customs agent, I would be wondering why this fellow is carrying that much gold in his pocket rather than a briefcase. Chris
Jason, wasn't that the coin you swallowed and your Dad had to wait for your next BM to get it back? J/K! Chris:hilarious:
PMD! Chris
Separate names with a comma.
