Either doctored or just not a recognized die pair. There is no way I could tell a modern fake from those pictures.
Well, it is not die pair #1, die pair #2 (there is no such thing), or die pair #4. I have reservations of it being die pair #3 either, but your...
I like your coin, but 2009 was running for 4 days because there were 4 coins. I think it was agreed today is for 2010.
Try this; [ATTACH]
The funniest part was eBay sent me an email telling me that in 3 days, most of the searches I had developed over years would no longer work...
I do not think it is grease. Grease would not give you the pitting I am seeing on the reverse and it sure looks to me like the obverse rim has...
[ATTACH][ATTACH][ATTACH][ATTACH]
I don't have enough of them to really see much, but my gut says no. Even the old ANACS (small slab) circulated coins looked to be graded the same.
ddoomm1 has rejoined the top ten again. Irish2Ice is actually missing a couple, but he is still well in the lead. Columns are rank, name,...
Not much wrong with this coin. Nice luster, solid strike, and the nick on the O (ONE) is the only one I can find. Almost 3/4 of you guessed 67...
The flat surfaces on this coin (as well as probably every other 1924-D) make the wear look like a lot. but ion hand, there is little wear. I...
Satin [ATTACH][ATTACH][ATTACH][ATTACH]
Circulation [ATTACH][ATTACH][ATTACH][ATTACH]
This is probably the most lop-sided woody I have seen. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
This and http://www.cointalk.com/t217114/ will be ending tonight. Sorry, but this will be the last round for a while.
This and http://www.cointalk.com/t217115/ will be ending tonight. Sorry, but this will be the last round for a while.
The oranger ones are satin (title is SPXXX). The colors are not really that different, but they photograph that different for some reason.
Somewhere between genuine and 63. That is all you can tell from one side.
Separate names with a comma.