As posted above, it is mechanical doubling, therefore no added value. 1989 was the last year the mintmarks were handpunched into a master die, so...
You're welcome. Which one was it?
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Hi and welcome to CT. It could be this https://en.numista.com/catalogue/exonumia15352.html or this...
Congratulations, an impressive amount of appreciation.
[ATTACH]
Slightly thinner or thicker is a normal part of the process. All coins have tolerances, here is another to file for ref [ATTACH]
Hi and welcome to CT. 1st coin has a small die chip above the flame,caused by a deteriorated die. 2nd coin looks like a typical weak strike on the...
Ignoring the detriments of the holder, it is still a fine looking coin
NO
Look forward to seeing any more FM coins you may have. There are not many fans of them here but I, and the gentleman above, certainly are.
Worth going to town for if you come home with a nice selection of change
It is always best to have an attribution reference, here is the relevant section, http://cuds-on-coins.com/jefferson-nickel-cuds-1984-1989/
The upsetting mill puts a proto rim in place with enough metal in that area for forming the full rim when struck in the collar. The collar is the...
Where is the doubling? There are 2 DDO to choose from for that date
Never seen anything like it. If that is a reeded edge the diameter looks to be smaller, and DIME is upside down and doesn't follow the curve of...
I honestly (obviously naively), thought that after the last couple of weeks on here, we would cease firing barbs at each other and stick to the...
Hi and welcome to CT. The best advice I was given when first starting in this hobby was; Reading and researching is more important than having...
The rims don't look like from a Proof. Could have been liberated from a Mint set
Most prices in books are already mostly out of date by the time they get into print. They are fine as a guide but check the sold listings on e-bay...
Separate names with a comma.
