1951-D NGC slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted. [ATTACH][ATTACH][ATTACH]
1909- VDB NGC slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted. [ATTACH][ATTACH]
Let me ask a dumb question. Is your lens clean? BTW, I would go 25/30 for that 22-D. You need to learn on other dates. Their strikes are all...
This and http://www.cointalk.com/threads/guess-the-grade-527.230325/ will be closing tonight.
This and http://www.cointalk.com/threads/guess-the-grade-528.230326/ will be closing tonight.
I don't think it is your focus. Try playing with the lighting. You might also try backing your camera up a bit. Your pictures are way larger...
You might be right, but I think it would go AU. But with all that glare where I am trying to see, that would be far from assured.
[ATTACH][ATTACH]
Could it be an end of run strike? i.e. the press was stopped before it had a full strike
I suspect you are right, but I also suspect there is something else going on
Second question. Is the diameter normal or larger than normal?
Just to be sure, can I assume that everything on the coin is raised?
Well, you are in the right territory. However, you pictures are so fuzzy, that (and that you are probably not overgrading) is about all I can say.
I am up to 10 proof and every one has the centered dot. BTW, here are the die characteristic for the proofs...
I am pretty sure that all proofs have the dot centered between the D and B. Yours does not. Sorry, but I doubt it is a proof.
Basically, yes. The defect in this case is the cleaning.
They will not grade it. They will call it genuine, VF details.
Now I am as sure as one can be from a picture it has been cleaned.
Maybe I am missing it, but it does not look to me like there is an option to have a profile picture any more.
I do not think you need worry about it any more. They are all gone. eBay took them down.
Separate names with a comma.
