Agreed. But considering I live in Maine. And like toners it makes sense
I didn’t even notice the tooled area. Saw enough wrong without that
They blew this one. And it’s why it’s never been cracked or tried for a higher grade. It’s a dud in every way and will always be a problem coin....
Know the deal with the tpgs. I have the 1880 trade dollar I paid $4k in an old white anacs I can’t get a straight grade on as it’s questionable...
First is 64 Second is au 50 I want a high grade monster toner of this issue for obvious reasons haven’t found the right coin.
No have major sellers remorse on this one. It didn’t fit anything I was collecting I just bought it cause it was pretty. Should have sold a couple...
Grease filled and it looks like worn die both. The weak portrait makes me think wear
$48
I’d buy a rb that’s mostly red. A lot of the times I find them more attractive anyway. And just cause a coin is in a straight graded red holder...
65 and pretty
Xf 40. I’d say possibly details but on an early one they’d let that dig slide
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I can say the same and a really tough date too
Ms 63 cac. Was very prooflike too. Ex Eric Newman. One I really regret selling actually
$195
That’s amazing it circulated that much. I bet everyone thought it was just another dime
I’m at 15 and an ancient cleaning or wipe. Mostly on the obverse
I’ve found pcgs pretty leinient about toned over old scratches on early coins. This is nothing new. They’ve always been consistent with that. Ngc...
Separate names with a comma.
