The state quarter appears to have been damaged intentionally on one side, by rubbing on concrete or something like that.
The weak T in trust may be a filled die, but there would be no premium for a coin like it. The others are all just damaged.
Lightly tapping a coin repeatedly around the edge will make it look like this. It is just damaged.
Yes, glue or something similar.
Nothing at all wrong with asking questions, if someone doesn't want to answer they don't have to. The coin was probably damaged long enough ago...
Yup, another coin has just been pressed into it. Probably vice marks on the reverse.
Not an error, it is just damaged.
There are no dates in that range that are valuable. There are a few errors and varieties within that range that have some value, but they are...
First you have to determine if they are worth anything over face value. There are very few cent coins in that date range of any value. You can...
The rim is simply pushed inward from the hit. No possible way for it to have come from the mint like that.
Paddyman's knows his errors, go with what he says.
Very nice off center cent! I am no error expert, I am sure they will be along but I would think it would be worth in the $20 area.
Yup, small date.
Look like plating blisters, but could also be a little bit of die damage I suppose. No big deal either way.
There is no chance that is silver. It looks exactly like a normal copper nickel cent that has been badly corroded and cleaned should look. Have...
Ah, okay however I don't see any evidence of a doubled die on the 1923.
Looks like heat damage to me too.
The 1923 looks normal to me, what do you mean by DDE? The 1988 D is not an error, just zinc rot as previously stated.
Just do a search on the forum, there will be many different years of plated cents. You will also find posts where people wonder why they are all...
The easiest way for me to tell the difference between the large and the small date is the shape of the 2. Look closely at the picture that...
Separate names with a comma.
