I thought the fake bagmarks on the left side of the reverse were a nice touch.
[IMG] [IMG]
Shill bidding is rampant, IMO.
Mainebill has a point. That is a really scarce Trade Dollar. Fixing the hole would help, but I worry about the amount of rim damage and how well...
A valuable error now that it's missing its outer layer!
That '43 is superb!
genuine, xf, and can't tell anything from scans about surface condition except that it probably hasn't been cleaned with Brillo or a belt sander....
The 1877 S is genuine, but cleaned or polished. Looks nearly uncirculated details wise.
I think #2 would look best in an album. Coin #1 is interesting as a conversation piece due to the "eclipse" toning and I would put it into one of...
I prefer the top set as the contrast is more tolerable. I think it may grade MS63. These are tiny coins and enlarged to this extent makes tiny...
agree with Vf 20 approx.
The one in the date isn't centered over a dentil, therefor a fake.
Overrated: I missed out on the ground floor, and now the coins are too expensive to buy and flip for a profit. Underrated: Underwater in coins...
nice patina and no damage. Good looking circ coin and very close to a Fine but not quite IMO
Pretty coin! I was going to guess 63 but late to the party; very tough to gauge surfaces and luster on a richly toned coin. Fun to play, though
Separate names with a comma.
