And, that is why I always say, "If you can't tell the difference between a 69 and a 70, buy the 69." Chris
The only years I'm aware of missing the designer's initials are the 1966 SMS, the 1972-D and the 1982-P. Chris
If you really want to learn, then you need to "shed" the thin skin, because you will get a lot of answers that don't meet your expectations. Just...
Yep. It's a spender. Chris
All it takes is a teeny, tiny nick in the cameo to turn a 70 into a 69. Chris
You quoted my post that was directed to *Islander80-83*. What does the damage on IGWT of this quarter have to do with the dime in your original...
When someone thinks that damage is a Mint error, then they shouldn't be looking for Mint errors. For some reason, I thought I was speaking to the...
I don't know about that price range. According to the 2x2, it's a '94-P. Chris
A die break could also be considered uneven rather than jagged. Chris
Your coin doesn't come close to the FS-101. Yours appears to have machine doubling. Chris
Where did you read the rule that states that all die breaks must be jagged? Chris
You shouldn't be looking for errors on well-worn coins. Chris
Not all clashes will show on both sides. Chris
How about backing off a little bit. You're too close. Chris
It looks like a strikethrough on the obverse, but why does it appear as part of the clash on the reverse? Am I hallucinating? Chris
@ldhair Larry, have you checked the sales history for any of these? Chris
It looks like damage to me. Chris
You're being facetious. Right? Chris
And, this is the guy who is always trying to weasel suggestions from the other CT members for improving (his) searches for coins and bullion....
I don't see any likeness of the two from your images. Chris
Separate names with a comma.
