Boy you are having some tough luck lately. I like it at the 65 5FS. I think it would be more attractive at a 66. Looks like it has enough luster.
I went with MS65FS with maybe a plus. I think that the bag mark high on the cheek and the rim dings obverse and reverse hold it from 66. Even if...
MS66 * 6fs. Just not sure they add the FS to these, as FS are common.
Looks good to me Randy, As long as the moisture stays down and temp is fairly even you should be ok.
Goodnight Ya'll. Got to get up and repeat the 10 hr day again. A Pedley-Ryan & Co coming soon.
I am not seeing anything just a circulated old cent. PS Die markers are you key to attributing. Mint Mark position should be your first go to....
I think it all depends on the luster, and that means that it could already be over graded.
Grade is MS65 It's got some purple, blue and gold pastels, with plenty of luster.
I would imagine that they are being found in old collections, plenty do just trade hands everyday on a regular basis.
Giving this a bump. I will post the grade this evening after work.
The other marker already photo'd is the MM placement. These two coins aren't from the same die pair. The D's are in different positions.
Ny one check the top? I have found a few..
GC has some high end buyers, Ean has some good clients.
I am looking for split serifs, look for another matching die marker.
Funny PMD!:D
Didn't the CAC at 66 take care of that? I think it has good eye appeal. I might give it a 67 In hand.
Good luck on the coin, I still have yet bought one, unless it is an in hand purchase.
Nope, I think you need a few more in gold.
Most if not all proof collectors want the pristine coins without blemishes. What would be intereting is if this coin has an earlier or later...
The surfaces are pretty clean of contact and show some nice luster, but I would expect the reverse to show more flash. At best not worthy of the...
Separate names with a comma.
